4.6 Article

Wetting of grain boundary triple junctions by intermetallic delta-phase in the Cu-In alloys

期刊

JOURNAL OF MATERIALS SCIENCE
卷 56, 期 13, 页码 7840-7848

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s10853-020-05674-4

关键词

-

资金

  1. state task of ISSP RAS
  2. CSC RAS
  3. IEM RAS

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This paper investigates the wetting behavior of grain boundary triple junctions by the second solid phase delta in Cu-In alloys, revealing a non-monotonic trend with increasing temperature. The study found that the wetting of grain boundary triple junctions also behaves non-monotonously, with the percentage of wetted triple junctions initially increasing to 100% and then decreasing with temperature rise.
The paper studies the wetting of grain boundary triple junctions (GB TJs) by the second solid phase (intermetallic) delta in the Cu-In alloys. In this system, the portion of grain boundaries in a copper-based solid solution (Cu), which are wetted by the second solid phase delta, changes non-monotonically with increasing temperature. At first, the portion of such completely wetted GBs increases from zero to almost 100% when the sample is heated, and then quickly falls back to zero. The condition of complete wetting for the GB TJs (sigma(GB) > 1.73 sigma(SS)) is less stringent than for the GBs (sigma(GB) > 2 sigma(SS)). Therefore, if the transition from incomplete to complete wetting occurs with an increase in temperature, then all GB TJs should become completely wetted at a temperature T-WTJ, lower than the temperature T-WGB, at which all GBs become completely wetted. In this work on the Cu-In system, it was found experimentally for the first time that the wetting of the GB TJs also behaves non-monotonously. The percentage of wetted GB TJs also increases to 100% at first and then falls with increasing temperature. In this case, the portion of wetted GB TJs exceeds the portion of wetted GBs not only when it increases with increasing temperature, but also then, with the subsequent disappearance of fully wetted GBs.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据