4.7 Review

Waste valorization using solid-phase microbial fuel cells (SMFCs): Recent trends and status

期刊

JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT
卷 277, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ACADEMIC PRESS LTD- ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2020.111417

关键词

Anaerobic digestion; Compost; Mass transfer; Microbial fuel cells; Solid-phase

资金

  1. SAPBN Universitas Diponegoro [205-09/UN7.P4/3/PP/2019]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This review article discusses the potential of solid-phase microbial fuel cells as a source of electrical energy from solid waste processing. It highlights the advantages and challenges of using SMFCs for treating solid waste, and notes that optimizing key factors can increase electricity generation.
This review article discusses the use of solid waste processed in solid-phase microbial fuel cells (SMFCs) as a source of electrical energy. Microbial Fuel Cells (MFCs) are typically operated in the liquid phase because the ion transfer process is efficient in liquid media. Nevertheless, some researchers have considered the potential for MFCs in solid phases (particularly for treating solid waste). This has promise if several important factors are optimized, such as the type and amount of substrate, microorganism community, system configuration, and type and number of electrodes, which increases the amount of electricity generated. The critical factor that affects the SMFC performance is the efficiency of electron and proton transfer through solid media. However, this limitation may be overcome by electrode system enhancements and regular substrate mixing. The integration of SMFCs with other conventional solid waste treatments could be used to produce sustainable green energy. Although SMFCs produce relatively small amounts of energy compared with other waste-to-energy treatments, SMFCs are still promising to achieve zero-emission treatment. Therefore, this article addresses the challenges and fills the gaps in SMFC research and development.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据