4.7 Article

Direct recovery of LiCoO2 from the recycled lithium-ion batteries via structure restoration

期刊

JOURNAL OF ALLOYS AND COMPOUNDS
卷 845, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE SA
DOI: 10.1016/j.jallcom.2020.156234

关键词

Lithium-ion batteries; Positive electrode; Regenerated LiCoO2; Electrochemical performances; Structure restoration

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51590902]
  2. Shanghai Municipal Natural Science Foundation [18ZR1415800]
  3. Gaoyuan Discipline of Shanghai - Environmental Science and Engineering (Resource Recycling Science and Engineering)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The efficient reutilization of electrode materials in waste lithium-ion batteries (LIBs) is an urgent and tough problem that grows along with the rapid increase in the use of LIBs in various areas, including portable electronic products, electric vehicles and backup power supplies. Herein, we propose a promising way to recover the LiCoO2 positive electrode material from the recycled LIBs via structure restoration. The collected spent LiCoO2 powder is mixed with lithium salts and sintered to form a sophisticated layered structure. When Li2CO3 is added as the lithium source and the mole ratio of lithium to cobalt is controlled at 1.00 in the mixture, a layered structure of regenerated LiCoO2 could be preferably obtained at a calcination temperature of 800 degrees C. To improve the electrochemical performance of the regenerated LiCoO2, nanosized Al2O3 particles are coated on the surface of the regenerated LiCoO2. The Al2O3-coated and regenerated LiCoO2 demonstrates comparable properties to those of commercial LiCoO2 materials. The regeneration of spent LiCoO2 via structure restoration, which is demonstrated in the present study, provides an effective way to reuse cobalt metal directly without traditional leaching and re-synthesis procedures, which reduces energy consumption and contributes to the environmental protection. (C) 2020 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据