4.5 Article

Progranulin is increased in human and murine lipodystrophy

期刊

出版社

ELSEVIER IRELAND LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.diabres.2016.07.017

关键词

Adipokine; Adipose tissue; Leptin treatment; Lipodystrophy; Progranulin

资金

  1. Bundesministerium fur Bildung und Forschung (BMBF), Germany [FKZ: 01EO1501, K6a-87]
  2. Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG) [SFB 1052/1, C06]
  3. Deutsche Hochdruckliga e.V.

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Aims: Lipodystrophies (LD) are genetic or acquired disorders sharing the symptom of partial or complete adipose tissue deficiency and a dysregulation of adipokines including leptin and adiponectin. Progranulin, an adipokine with proinflammatory and insulin resistance-inducing characteristics, has not been investigated in LD so far. Methods: Circulating progranulin was determined in LD patients (N = 37) and in age-, gender-, and body mass index-matched healthy control subjects (N = 37). Additionally, we investigated progranulin expression in an LD mouse model as compared to wild-type mice. Moreover, we elucidated circulating progranulin before and during metreleptin supplementation in 10 patients with LD. Results: Median [interquartile range] circulating progranulin was increased in patients with LD (82.9 [25.9] mu g/l) as compared to controls (73.6 [22.8] mu g/l) (p = 0.005). C-reactive protein (CRP) remained an independent and positive predictor of progranulin in multivariate analysis. Progranulin mRNA was significantly upregulated in all adipose tissue depots, i.e. visceral, subcutaneous, and brown adipose tissue, and in muscle of LD animals versus wild-type mice. Progranulin levels did not significantly change during metreleptin supplementation. Conclusions: Progranulin serum concentration is increased in patients with LD, and shows an independent and positive correlation with CRP. Different adipose tissue depots and muscle might be potential origins of elevated progranulin. (C) 2016 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据