4.7 Article

Heat-pipe based spray-cooling thermal management system for lithium-ion battery: Experimental study and optimization

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijheatmasstransfer.2020.120494

关键词

Spray cooling; Heat pipe; Thermal management; Lithium-ion battery

资金

  1. Ningbo Science and Technology Bureau Technology Innovation Team [2016B10010]
  2. Zhejiang and Ningbo Key Disciplines of Materials Science and Engineering at the University of Nottingham Ningbo China

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Today, performance of lithium-ion battery is still limited by its operating temperature. The upper bound is capped by 50 degrees C. However, this limit is easily surpassed if batteries work at a high room temperature. In this article, sintered copper-powder heat pipe combining with water spray at its condensation section is designed to attack this issue-The former is sandwiched among batteries, removing battery heat by air convection under normal thermal conditions. When battery operation deteriorates at a room temperature beyond 40 degrees C, water spray functions for rapid heat dissipation by droplet evaporation. To assess effectiveness of this battery thermal management (BTM) design, discharge of lithium iron phosphate batteries at two large currents, I-d = 12.5 A and 24 A, are performed at 40 degrees C. The cooling performance of the proposed BTM system is examined at different air speeds, air relative humidity, spraying frequencies and duty cycles. It is also compared to other heat-pipe based BTM approaches, and tested in transient cycles. The results demonstrate the proposed BTM system is highly effective. In the case of I-d = 24 A, the maximum temperature and maximum temperature difference of the battery surface are dropped by 29.2 degrees C and 8.0 degrees C in comparison to those without BTM aids. It well protects lithium-ion battery operating at a large discharging current in an adverse thermal environment. (C) 2020 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据