4.7 Article

Effects of vitamin D2 or D3 supplementation on glycaemic control and cardiometabolic risk among people at risk of type 2 diabetes: results of a randomized double-blind placebo-controlled trial

期刊

DIABETES OBESITY & METABOLISM
卷 18, 期 4, 页码 392-400

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/dom.12625

关键词

intervention; placebo; pulse wave velocity; randomized; trial; type 2 diabetes; vitamin D-2; vitamin D-3

资金

  1. Queen Mary University of London
  2. Medical Research Council Epidemiology Unit at Cambridge
  3. NHS Tower Hamlets Primary Care NHS Trust
  4. East London CLRN
  5. MRC Epidemiology Unit core funding [MC_UP_A100_1003, MC_U106179474, MC_UU_12015/5, MC_UU_12015/4]
  6. MRC [MC_UP_A100_1003, MC_UU_12015/5, MC_U106179474, MC_UU_12015/4] Funding Source: UKRI
  7. Medical Research Council [MC_UU_12015/5, MC_UU_12015/4, MC_U106179474, MC_UP_A100_1003] Funding Source: researchfish

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Aims: To investigate the effect of short-term vitamin D supplementation on cardiometabolic outcomes among individuals with an elevated risk of diabetes. Methods: In a double-blind placebo-controlled randomized trial, 340 adults who had an elevated risk of type 2 diabetes (non-diabetic hyperglycaemia or positive diabetes risk score) were randomized to either placebo, 100 000 IU vitamin D-2 (ergocalciferol) or 100 000 IU vitamin D-3 (cholecalciferol), orally administered monthly for 4 months. The primary outcome was change in glycated haemoglobin (HbA1c) between baseline and 4 months, adjusted for baseline. Secondary outcomes included: blood pressure; lipid levels; apolipoprotein levels; C-reactive protein levels; pulse wave velocity (PWV); anthropometric measures; and safety of the supplementation. Results: The mean [standard deviation (s.d.)] 25-hydroxyvitamin D [25(OH)D](2) concentration increased from 5.2 (4.1) to 53.9 (18.5) nmol/l in the D-2 group, and the mean (s.d.) 25(OH)D-3 concentration increased from 45.8 (22.6) to 83.8 (22.7) nmol/l in the D-3 group. There was no effect of vitamin D supplementation on HbA1c: D-2 versus placebo: -0.05% [95% confidence interval (CI) -0.11, 0.02] or -0.51 mmol/mol (95% CI -1.16, 0.14; p=0.13); D-3 versus placebo: 0.02% (95% CI -0.04, 0.08) or 0.19 mmol/mol (95% CI -0.46, 0.83; p=0.57). There were no clinically meaningful effects on secondary outcomes, except PWV [D-2 versus placebo: -0.68 m/s (95% CI -1.31, -0.05); D-3 versus placebo -0.73 m/s (95% CI -1.42, -0.03)]. No important safety issues were identified. Conclusions: Short-term supplementation with vitamin D-2 or D-3 had no effect on HbA1c. The modest reduction in PWV with both D-2 and D-3 relative to placebo suggests that vitamin D supplementation has a beneficial effect on arterial stiffness.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据