4.7 Article

Describing hierarchy of concept lattice by using matrix

期刊

INFORMATION SCIENCES
卷 542, 期 -, 页码 58-70

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.ins.2020.05.020

关键词

Concept analysis; Concept lattice category; Description problem; Hierarchy-matrix

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The paper presents a new method for describing the hierarchy of a finite concept lattice using a matrix, establishing a one-to-one correspondence between a finite topological space and a proper square matrix with integral entries. The hierarchy-matrix allows for storage and understanding of hierarchy information of the concept lattice, facilitating autonomous interpretation by software.
Concept lattices (also called Galois lattices) are complete ones with the hierarchical order relation of the formal concepts defined by a formal context or Galois connection. In this paper, we present a new of method describing a hierarchy of a finite concept lattice by using a matrix. Given a finite concept lattice L, we introduce Scott topology sigma(L) on L and choose an order of a unique minimal base for sigma(L). Then, there is a one-to-one correspondence between the finite topological space (L, sigma(L)) and a proper square matrix with integral entries; thus we obtain a hierarchy-matrix describing the hierarchy of the concept lattice. We explain how to get the information of the hierarchy from the hierarchy-matrix and discuss the relation between the hierarchy-matrix and the Hasse diagram. Since the hierarchy-matrix allowed us to store the information of hierarchy of the concept lattice, we believe that any software autonomously understand the information of hierarchy of the concepts from the hierarchy-matrix and the Hasse diagram. Since the hierarchy-matrix allowed us to store the information of hierarchy of the concept lattice, we believe that any software autonomously understand the information of hierarchy of the concepts from the hierarchy-matrix. (C) 2020 Published by Elsevier Inc.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据