4.3 Article

Experimental Assessment of the Lumped Lithium Ion Battery Model at Different Operating Conditions

期刊

HEAT TRANSFER ENGINEERING
卷 43, 期 3-5, 页码 314-325

出版社

TAYLOR & FRANCIS INC
DOI: 10.1080/01457632.2021.1874666

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Through experimental data and modeling analysis, it is found that the operating temperature and discharge rate significantly impact the internal resistance and heat generation within the lithium-ion cell, leading to a significant capacity decrease at low temperatures. The predicted temperature profile aligns closely with experimental data, indicating consistency across different operating conditions.
This study investigates the electrical and thermal characteristics of a cylindrical lithium-ion cell with an axisymmetric two-dimensional lumped model. The cell is completely discharged at 0.5, 1 and 1.5 C rates under 0, 20 and 50 degrees C operating temperatures. Both the open circuit voltage values and the average specific heat value of the cell are measured and used as an input to the model. The model uses the variable internal resistance approach to evaluate the voltage variation of the cell that is obtained from experimental data. A cylindrical lithium-ion cell has a spiral construction that involves multiple layers. However, these layers are assumed as a uniform material in the lumped model. The lumped model in COMSOL Multiphysics couples the heat transfer and lumped battery interfaces so it allows predicting the surface temperature of the cell during discharging processes. The experimental results point out that the operating temperature inversely affects the internal resistance and the heat generation within the cell during a discharging process. Furthermore, it is found that the capacity of the cell significantly decreases at low operating temperatures. Finally, the predicted temperature profile follows the same trend with the experimental data and is consistent at each operating condition.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据