4.7 Article

An in situ method for quantifying tillage effects on soil structure using multistripe laser triangulation

期刊

GEODERMA
卷 380, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.geoderma.2020.114642

关键词

Soil structure quantification; 3D scanning; No-till; Vertisol

资金

  1. United States Department of Agriculture National Institute of Food and Agriculture [2018-67019-27975]
  2. United States Department of Agriculture National Resource Conservation Service , Texas Soil Survey

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Soil structure is an important physical property that can be degraded by soil tillage, but methods for quantifying soil structure are both few and time consuming. We developed a method for multistripe laser triangulation (MLT) scanning to quantify soil structure that can be accomplished quickly (15 min of scanning per A horizon exposure) in the field. We scanned three soil pits to a depth of 30 cm in three fields under conventional tillage (CT), three under no-fill (NT) and three under perennial grass (PG). For both 0- to 10- and 0- to 30-cm pit depths, we calculated the Dirichlet tessellation area variability (DTAV) for each pit. We found the DTAV from 0- to 10cm depths was sensitive to tillage type (p = 0.09) and clay percentage (p = 0.06), while the 0- to 30-cm depths were sensitive to neither. Specifically, CT fields had significantly higher 0- to 10-cm DTAVs than NT (p = 0.06) and PG (p = 0.07) fields, while NT and PG were not different from one another (p = 0.99). The information carried by the DTAV may be thought of as the regularly of the Dirichlet tessellation feature areas, which is driven by the regularity of observable soil structural units in the field. The DTAV was not significantly related to soil structure type, grade, or class size described in the field. The DTAV provides an alternative or complement to field soil descriptions that is quick, repeatable, objective, and sensitive to changes in soil structure in response to tillage practice.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据