4.5 Review

Universal and selective interventions to promote good mental health in young people: Systematic review and meta-analysis

期刊

EUROPEAN NEUROPSYCHOPHARMACOLOGY
卷 41, 期 -, 页码 28-39

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.euroneuro.2020.10.007

关键词

Promotion; Good mental health; Universal; Selective; Intervention; Outcomes

资金

  1. European College of Neuropsychopharmacology Network Board
  2. Alicia Koplowitz Foundation
  3. PSYSCAN project through the European Commission
  4. Janssen
  5. Takeda
  6. Lundbeck
  7. Acadia
  8. Angelini
  9. Gedeon Richter
  10. Janssen Cilag
  11. Otsuka
  12. Roche
  13. Sage
  14. Servier
  15. Shire
  16. Schering Plough
  17. Sumitomo Dainippon Pharma
  18. Sunovion
  19. Janssen/JJ
  20. LB Pharma
  21. Pfizer
  22. Recordati
  23. Abbott
  24. Allergan
  25. Dainippon Sumitomo Pharma
  26. Novartis
  27. Richter
  28. Sanofi-Aventis

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Promotion of good mental health in young people is important. Our aim was to evaluate the consistency and magnitude of the efficacy of universal/selective interventions to promote good mental health. A systematic PRISMA/RIGHT-compliant meta-analysis (PROSPERO: CRD42018088708) search of Web of Science until 04/31/2019 identified original studies comparing the efficacy of universal/selective interventions for good mental health vs a control group, in samples with a mean age < 35 years. Meta-analytical random-effects model, heterogeneity statistics, assessment of publication bias, study quality and sensitivity analyses investigated the efficacy (Hedges' g = effect size, ES) of universal/selective interventions to promote 14 good mental health outcomes defined a-priori. 276 studies were included (total participants: 159,508, 79,142 interventions and 80,366 controls), mean age = 15.0 (SD = 7.4); female = 56.0%. There was a significant overall improvement in 10/13 good mental health outcome categories that could be meta-analysed: compared to controls, interventions significantly improved (in descending order of magnitude) mental health literacy (ES = 0.685, p < 0.001), emotions (ES = 0.541, p < 0.001), self-perceptions and values (ES = 0.49, p < 0.001), quality of life (ES = 0.457, p = 0.001), cognitive skills (ES = 0.428, p < 0.001), social skills (ES = 0.371, p < 0.001), physical health (ES = 0.285, p < 0.001), sexual health (ES = 0.257, p = 0.017), academic/occupational performance (ES = 0.211, p < 0.001) and attitude towards mental disorders (ES = 0.177, p = 0.006). Psychoeducation was the most effective intervention for promoting mental health literacy (ES = 0.774, p < 0.001) and cognitive skills (ES = 1.153, p = 0.03). Physical therapy, exercise and relaxation were more effective than psychoeducation and psychotherapy for promoting physical health (ES= 0.498, p<0.001). In conclusion, several universal/selective interventions can be effective to promote good mental health in young people. Future research should consolidate and extend these findings. (c) 2020 The Authors. Published by Elsevier B.V. This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/)

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据