4.8 Article

Laboratory Demonstration and Preliminary Techno-Economic Analysis of an Onsite Wastewater Treatment System

期刊

ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY
卷 54, 期 24, 页码 16147-16155

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acs.est.0c02755

关键词

blackwater; techno-economic analysis; granular activated carbon (GAC); ultrafiltration; electrochemical disinfection; ISO 30500; nonsewered sanitation system (NSSS); onsite wastewater treatment system (OWTS)

资金

  1. Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation [OPP1174988]
  2. Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation through Duke University's Center for WaSH-AID [OPP1173370]
  3. Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation [OPP1174988, OPP1173370] Funding Source: Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Providing safe and reliable sanitation services to the billions of people currently lacking them will require a multiplicity of approaches. Improving onsite wastewater treatment to standards enabling water reuse would reduce the need to transport waste and fresh water over long distances. Here, we describe a compact, automated system designed to treat the liquid fraction of blackwater for onsite water reuse that combines cross-flow ultrafiltration, activated carbon, and electrochemical oxidation. In laboratory testing, the system consistently produces effluent with 6 <= pH <= 9, total suspended solids (TSS) < 30 mg L-1, and chemical oxygen demand (COD) < 150 mg L-1. These effluent parameters were achieved across a wide range of values for influent TSS (61-820 mg L-1) and COD (384-1505 mg L-1), demonstrating a robust system for treating wastewater of varying strengths. A preliminary techno-economic analysis (TEA) was conducted to elucidate primary cost drivers and prioritize research and development pathways toward commercial feasibility. The ultrafiltration system is the primary cost driver, contributing to >50% of both the energy and maintenance costs. Several scenario parameters showed an outsized impact on costs relative to technology parameters. Specific technological improvements for future prototype development are discussed.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据