4.8 Article

Bioaccumulation and Trophic Transfer of Polybrominated Diphenyl Ethers and Their Hydroxylated and Methoxylated Analogues in Polar Marine Food Webs

期刊

ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY
卷 54, 期 23, 页码 15086-15096

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acs.est.0c05427

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [91743206, 21777186, 22076215, 41977327]
  2. Eco-environmental Excellent Innovation projects of Research Center for Eco-Environmental Sciences [RCEES-EEI-2019-01]
  3. Chinese Arctic and Antarctic Administration
  4. Polar Research Institute of China

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Arctic and Antarctic marine ecosystems, which are important components of global biodiversity, have been severely threatened by environmental pollutants in recent decades. In this study, polybrominated diphenyl ethers (PBDEs) and their hydroxylated and methoxylated analogues (OH-PBDEs and MeO-PBDEs) were analyzed in seawater, sediment, and marine organisms (algae, invertebrates, and fishes) collected surrounding the Arctic Yellow River Station (n = 83) and the Antarctic Great Wall Station (n = 72). PBDEs and the analogues were detectable in all polar marine matrices, except MeO-PBDEs in seawater. The concentrations of Sigma PBDEs, Sigma MeO-PBDEs, and Sigma OH-PBDEs in the marine organisms were in the range of 0.33-16 ng/g lipid weight (lw), n.d.-2.6 ng/g lw, and 0.12-2.3 ng/g lw in the Arctic and 0.06-31 ng/g lw, n.d.-5.8 ng/g lw, and 0.17-35 ng/g lw in Antarctica, respectively. Biota-sediment bioaccumulation factor (BSAF, g TOC/g lipid) values of Sigma MeO-PBDEs (0.002-0.14) and Sigma OH-PBDEs (0.004-0.18) were lower than the BSAF values of PBDEs (0.85-12). Trophic magnification was found for Sigma MeO-PBDEs, whereas trophic dilution was observed for EOH-PBDEs in both regions. This is one of very few investigations on trophic transfer of PBDE metabolites in the Antarctic and Arctic regions and will further strengthen concerns about the ecological risk of PBDE metabolites in remote areas.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据