4.4 Article

A framework for evaluating developmental defects at the cellular level: An example from ten maize anther mutants using morphological and molecular data

期刊

DEVELOPMENTAL BIOLOGY
卷 419, 期 1, 页码 26-40

出版社

ACADEMIC PRESS INC ELSEVIER SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1016/j.ydbio.2016.03.016

关键词

Anther development; Male sterility; Periclinal division; Somatic cell fate

资金

  1. NSF [IOS13-1339229]
  2. National Institutes of Health (NIH) Cell and Molecular Biology Training Grant [5T32GM007276-36]
  3. American Society of Plant Biologists-Pioneer Hi-Bred Graduate Student Fellowship
  4. Agriculture and Food Research Initiative Competitive Grant from the United States Department of Agriculture (USDA) National Institute of Food and Agriculture (NIFA) [2013-67011-21096]
  5. NIFA [2013-67011-21096, 577563] Funding Source: Federal RePORTER
  6. Direct For Biological Sciences
  7. Division Of Integrative Organismal Systems [1649424] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In seed plants, anthers are critical for sexual reproduction, because they foster both meiosis and subsequent pollen development of male germinal cells. Male-sterile mutants are analyzed to define steps in anther development. Historically the major topics in these studies are meiotic arrest and post-meiotic gametophyte failure, while relatively few studies focus on pre-meiotic defects of anther somatic cells. Utilizing morphometric analysis we demonstrate that pre-meiotic mutants can be impaired in anticlinal or periclinal cell division patterns and that final cell number in the pre-meiotic anther lobe is independent of cell number changes of individual differentiated somatic cell types. Data derived from microarrays and from cell wall NMR analyses allow us to further refine our understanding of the onset of phenotypes. Collectively the data highlight that even minor deviations from the correct spatiotemporal pattern of somatic cell proliferation can result in male sterility in Zea mays. (C) 2016 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据