4.7 Article

Theory and experiment on true mode II fracturing of rocks

期刊

ENGINEERING FRACTURE MECHANICS
卷 240, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.engfracmech.2020.107314

关键词

True mode II fracturing; Mode II fracture toughness; Double-edge notched Brazilian disk test; fracture type criterion; Shear failure

资金

  1. Swiss Federal Office of Energy [Sl/501912-01]
  2. Swiss Innovation Agency Innosuisse to the Swiss Competence Center for Energy Research Supply of Electricity (SCCER-SoE)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This paper discusses the use of the double-edge notched Brazilian disk test (DNBD) for measuring true mode II fracture toughness of rocks. The term true emphasises that in this test, not only is the crack tip loading shear-based, but also the material failure is shear-induced. Conventional mode II tests typically experience dominantly tensile failure. We introduce a fracture growth criterion that explains where and how a shear-based fracture extension occurs. Our theoretical analysis demonstrates that large values of compressive T-stress in the DNBD specimen significantly help inducing a true mode II fracturing. Crack tip parameters are computed by finite element analyses for various notch lengths and loading angles. These values are then employed to determine the geometry and loading condition for the optimal performance of the test. We also compare the DNBD with two other available tests for measuring true mode II fracture toughness, and show that the DNBD test typically has a lower contribution of mode I loading than the two alternative approaches and, therefore, better approximates the true mode II condition while at the same time being the experimentally simplest. Three types of rocks (limestone, marble and granite) were tested using the new approach and their true mode II fracture toughness is reported for two different crack lengths. The measured true mode II fracture toughness is compared with the mode I fracture toughness obtained from the semi-circular bending test.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据