4.7 Article

Kinetic study of semiclathrate hydrates formed with CO2 in the presence of tetra-n-butyl ammonium bromide and tetra-n-butyl phosphonium bromide

期刊

ENERGY
卷 212, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.energy.2020.118697

关键词

Gas hydrates; Semiclathrate hydrate; CO2 capture; Subcooling; Formation kinetics

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51676021, U19B2009]
  2. State Key Laboratory of Coal Mine Disaster Dynamics and Control [2011DA105287-FW201801]
  3. Program for Changjiang Scholars and Innovative Research Team in University [IRT_17R112]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The kinetics of semiclathrate hydrates formation with CO2 in the presence of tetra-n-butyl ammonium bromide (TBAB), tetra-n-butyl phosphonium bromide (TBPB), and TBAB + TBPB were investigated. The experiments were conducted at the stoichiometric concentration of TBAB hydrate (2.57 mol%) and three subcoolings (DT = 6 K, 9 K, and 12 K) with the initial pressure fixed at 2.8 MPa. It was found that adding TBPB into the TBAB solution can promote hydrate nucleation, and this promotion effect at a lower subcooling (DT = 6 K) was stronger compared to that at higher subcoolings (DT = 9 K and 12 K). The gas consumption obtained in TBAB, TBPB, and TBAB + TBPB solutions decreased with the increase of sub cooling, despite the increase of the rate of hydrate growth. At a given subcooling, gas consumption (CO2 uptake) in TBAB + TBPB solutions was greater than that in TBAB and TBPB solutions, indicating that hydrate formation kinetics and the CO2 storage capacity were improved in the TBAB + TBPB solution. The largest gas consumption was obtained at DT = 6 K in the TBAB + TBPB solution, which was 28.7% and 17.2% larger than those obtained in TBAB and TBPB solutions, respectively. Therefore, a mixture of TBAB + TBPB is a promising option to improve the kinetics of semiclathrate hydrate formation with CO2. (c) 2020 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据