4.6 Article

A simple approach for controlling the morphology of g-C3N4 nanosheets with enhanced photocatalytic properties

期刊

DIAMOND AND RELATED MATERIALS
卷 111, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE SA
DOI: 10.1016/j.diamond.2020.108214

关键词

G-C3N4 nanosheets; Semiconductors, large surface area; Photocatalysis

资金

  1. Vietnam Academy of Science and Technology

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This work focuses on synthesizing g-C3N4 nanosheets with a large surface area for enhanced solar light photocatalytic performance. The effects of annealing duration on the properties of g-C3N4 nanosheets were investigated, showing different morphologies and improved photocatalytic properties with increasing annealing time. The ultrathin g-C3N4 samples exhibited considerable potential in environmental remediation under solar irradiation.
In this work, we focus on synthesizing g-C3N4 nanosheets with a large surface area for enhanced solar light photocatalytic performance via a simple thermal polymerization of a low-cost urea precursor in enclosed conditions. The effects of annealing duration on the phase formation, structure, and optical and photocatalytic properties of the g-C3N4 nanosheets were investigated. The characterization analysis revealed that g-C3N4 nanosheets with different textures, including stacked-layer, porous and ultrathin morphologies, were obtained by controlling the annealing time. The prepared g-C3N4 samples offer a large specific surface area, narrow band gap and efficient separation of photogenerated electron-hole pairs with increasing annealing duration. The photo catalytic properties of the as-synthesized g-C3N4 samples were examined by measuring the degradation of rhodamine B (RhB) under simulated solar irradiation. With a 100% RhB solution (10 ppm) decomposed by exposure to solar irradiation for 60 min, ultrathin g-C3N4 shows considerable potential in practical applications concerning environmental remediation, especially in large-scale applications in industry.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据