4.8 Article

Mechanochemical feedback mediates tissue bending required for seedling emergence

期刊

CURRENT BIOLOGY
卷 31, 期 6, 页码 1154-+

出版社

CELL PRESS
DOI: 10.1016/j.cub.2020.12.016

关键词

-

资金

  1. Knut and Alice Wallenberg Foundation [2014-0032]
  2. Vetenskapsradet [2016-00504]
  3. Kempe foundation
  4. Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada [RGPIN-2018-05762, RGPIN-2018-04897]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Research has shown a spatial correlation between asymmetric auxin distribution and methylesterified pectin in the epidermal layer of Arabidopsis hypocotyl, indicating the essential role of this mechanochemical asymmetry in cell elongation. A positive feedback loop between auxin distribution and pectin methylesterification promotes tissue bending and seedling emergence.
Tissue bending is vital to plant development, as exemplified by apical hook formation during seedling emergence by bending of the hypocotyl. How tissue bending is coordinated during development remains poorly understood, especially in plants where cells are attached via rigid cell walls. Asymmetric distribution of the plant hormone auxin underlies differential cell elongation during apical hook formation. Yet the underlying mechanism remains unclear. Here, we demonstrate spatial correlation between asymmetric auxin distribution, methylesterified homogalacturonan (HG) pectin, and mechanical properties of the epidermal layer of the hypocotyl in Arabidopsis. Genetic and cell biological approaches show that this mechanochemical asymmetry is essential for differential cell elongation. We show that asymmetric auxin distribution underlies differential HG methylesterification, and conversely changes in HG methylesterification impact the auxin response domain. Our results suggest that a positive feedback loop between auxin distribution and HG methylesterification underpins asymmetric cell wall mechanochemical properties to promote tissue bending and seedling emergence.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据