4.7 Article

Thermally Induced Crystallization and Phase Evolution of Amorphous Calcium Phosphate Substituted with Divalent Cations Having Different Sizes

期刊

CRYSTAL GROWTH & DESIGN
卷 21, 期 2, 页码 1242-1248

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acs.cgd.0c01534

关键词

-

资金

  1. European Social Fund [09.3.3-LMT-K-712-19-0069]
  2. Research Council of Lithuania (LMTLT)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The substitution of smaller ions promotes the formation of beta-TCP at lower temperatures, while larger ions retard the crystallization process. The presence of Mg is more significant in the transformation of alpha-TCP to beta-TCP compared to Zn. Additionally, Ba stabilizes the crystal structure of alpha-TCP and prevents phase transition to beta-TCP.
The present work investigates the crystallization and phase evolution of amorphous calcium phosphate (ACP) partially substituted with smaller (Mg2+, Zn2+) and larger (Sr2+, Ba2+) divalent ions in the range from 1 to 10 mol % (M/P = 1.5:1). It has been demonstrated that the crystallization of ACP to tricalcium phosphate (TCP) and subsequent phase transformations between TCP polymorphs strongly depend on the nature and concentration of the substituents in the ACP matrix. Two different effects induced by the presence of foreign ions were observed. Substitution with smaller ions did not affect the crystallization temperature but promoted the formation of beta-TCP at a significantly lower temperature compared to the phase evolution of pristine ACP. Moreover, the effect of Mg was found to be more significant than that of Zn in the transformation of metastable alpha-TCP to beta-TCP. On the other hand, substitution with larger ions retarded the crystallization process, which was observed at elevated temperatures. While the substitution level of 10 mol % of Sr did not affect the thermal stability of metastable alpha-TCP, the presence of 10 mol % of Ba stabilized alpha-TCP crystal structure and totally prevented the phase transition to beta-TCP.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据