4.7 Article

Prediction of lung mechanics throughout recruitment maneuvers in pressure-controlled ventilation

期刊

出版社

ELSEVIER IRELAND LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.cmpb.2020.105696

关键词

Mechanical ventilation; Pressure-controlled ventilation; Recruitment maneuvers; Respiratory mechanics; Virtual patients; Personalised care; Prediction

资金

  1. NZ Tertiary Education Commission (TEC) fund MedTech CoRE (Centre of Research Expertise)
  2. NZ National Science Challenge 7, Science for Technology and Innovation
  3. Engineering Technology-based Innovation in Medicine (eTIME) consortium grant [eTIME 318943]
  4. EU FP7 International Research StaffExchange Scheme (IRSES) [PIRSES-GA-2012-318943]
  5. Binational Institute for Knowledge Engineering in Medicine
  6. EU H2020 R&I programme - German Federal Ministry of Research and Education [872488 -DCPM.BIKEM FKZ: 01DR17024]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Mechanical ventilation (MV) is a core therapy in the intensive care unit (ICU). Some patients rely on MV to support breathing. However, it is a difficult therapy to optimise, where interand intrapatient variability leads to significantly increased risk of lung damage. Excessive volume and/or pressure can cause volutrauma or barotrauma, resulting in increased length of time on ventilation, length of stay, cost and mortality. Virtual patient modelling has changed care in other areas of ICU medicine, enabling more personalized and optimal care, and have emerged for volume-controlled MV. This research extends this MV virtual patient model into the increasingly more commonly used pressure-controlled MV mode. The simulation methods are extended to use pressure, instead of both volume and flow, as the known input, increasing the output variables to be predicted (flow and its integral, volume). The model and methods are validated using data from N = 14 pressure-control ventilated patients during recruitment maneuvers, with n = 558 prediction tests over changes of PEEP ranging from 2 to 16 cmH(2)O. Prediction errors for peak inspiratory volume for an increase of 16 cmH(2)O were 80 [30 - 140] mL (15.9 [8.4 - 31.0]%), with RMS fitting errors of 0.05 [0.03 - 0.12] L. These results show very good prediction accuracy able to guide personalised MV care. (C) 2020 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据