4.6 Article

Statistical physics modeling and optimization of norfloxacin adsorption onto graphene oxide

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.colsurfa.2020.125534

关键词

Adsorption mechanism; Statistical physics models; Statistical optimization; Central composite design; Response surface methodology; Graphene oxide

资金

  1. Fundacao de Amparo a Pesquisa de Minas Gerais (FAPEMIG)
  2. Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Cientifico e Tecnologico (CNPq)
  3. Coordenacao de Aperfeicoamento de Pessoal de Nivel Superior - Brasil (CAPES) [001]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The present research focused on graphene oxide (GO) synthesis and its application for norfloxacin (NOR) removal from aqueous solution. A better comprehension of the uptake process was verified by five different statistical models developed specifically for aqueous solutions, and the process was optimized by a central composite design (CCD) and desirability function. The elementary analysis confirmed the expanded graphite oxidation onto GO. The material is organized in an average of 8 stacked layers 0.9 nm apart, with a mean thickness of 7.2 nm. Functional groups were also identified on the material surface, which would promote a higher interaction between the GO and NOR. The uptake process was best described by Hill's model involving two sites and energies (epsilon(1) = 12.73 kJ/mol and epsilon(2) = 18.85 kJ/mol), characterized by a multi-molecule adsorption process (n(1) = 1.41 and n(2) = 1.12). Regarding the CCD design, the most important factor was the initial GO concentration. Optimized operational conditions led to a theoretical removal efficiency of 100 %. The model was validated, and an experimental maximum removal was found to be 99.94 +/- 0.05 %, with no significant difference between the theoretical one. These results corroborated to the development of a robust mathematical model capable to predict the removal efficiencies given the operational conditions, giving a complete disclosure on the mechanisms involved in the adsorption process.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据