4.8 Article

Adjusting the Valence State of Vanadium in VO2(B) by Extracting Oxygen Anions for High-Performance Aqueous Zinc-Ion Batteries

期刊

CHEMSUSCHEM
卷 14, 期 3, 页码 971-978

出版社

WILEY-V C H VERLAG GMBH
DOI: 10.1002/cssc.202002401

关键词

batteries; defect engineering; energy storage; vanadium; zinc

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51771071]
  2. Guidance Project of Scientific Research Program from Hubei Provincial Department of Education [B2019046]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In this study, oxygen-deficient VO2-x(B) is prepared by a simple solution reaction and shows improved electrochemical performance and structural stability, making it suitable for aqueous Zn/VO2-x(B) batteries. The reversible insertion-extraction mechanism of Zn2+ ions is demonstrated using ex situ characterization techniques, even with high-loading electrodes.
VO2 generally has a higher theoretical capacity and layered structure suitable for the intercalation/extraction of zinc ions. However, Zn2+ ions with high charge density interact with the crystal lattice and limit further improvement in electrochemical performance. Defect engineering is a potential modification method with very promising application prospects, but the established procedures for preparing defects are complicated. In this study, VO2-x(B) with oxygen deficiency is prepared by a simple solution reaction with NaBH4. The presence of oxygen deficiencies is confirmed by positron annihilation lifetime spectroscopy, UV/Vis absorbance spectroscopy and others. Owing to the presence of oxygen defects, the aqueous Zn/VO2-x(B) battery exhibits improved specific capacity, excellent reversibility, and structural stability. Ex situ characterization techniques are employed to demonstrate the reversible insertion-extraction mechanism of Zn2+ ions from and into the host material. In addition, the Zn/VO2-x(B) batteries still exhibit considerable electrochemical performance, even with high-loading electrodes (about 4 mg cm(-2)).

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据