4.7 Article

Characterization of microbial communities in water and biofilms along a large scale SWRO desalination facility: Site-specific prerequisite for biofouling treatments

期刊

DESALINATION
卷 378, 期 -, 页码 44-52

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.desal.2015.09.023

关键词

Desalination; Biofouling; Microbial-communities; Proteobacteria; Reverse-osmosis fouling; Desalination-pretreatment

资金

  1. Israeli Water Authority [4500445459]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Biofouling impacts seawater reverse osmosis (SWRO) desalination plants by hindering module performance, increasing energetic demands, and incurring further costs. Here we investigated the spatial-temporal dynamics of microbial communities along the feedwater, pretreatment, and reverse osmosis stages of a large-scale SWRO desalination facility. While the composition of water-based microbial communities varied seasonally, the composition of biofilm microbial communities clustered by locations. Proteobacteria dominated throughout the water and biofilm communities while other dominant phyla varied seasonally and spatially. The microbial community composition significantly differed along the pathway locations of feedwater, rapid sand filtration (RSF), cartridge filters (CF), and the reverse osmosis (RO) membranes. Biofilms on the RSF and CF were composed of more diverse microbial populations than RO biofilms as determined by the effective number of species. Biofilms that developed along the treatment pathway (CF) served as inocula enhancing biofouling downstream on the RO membranes. Subsequently, we believe that prior to the development of advanced antibiofouling treatments for the desalination industries, the site-specific microbial community of feedwater, pretreatment and RO biofouling should be characterized. Site specific identification of these communities will enable optimization of pretreatment and cleaning procedures and can ultimately reduce chemical usage and incurred costs. (C) 2015 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据