4.7 Article

Influence of CO2 concentration on the performance of MgO cement mixes

期刊

CEMENT & CONCRETE COMPOSITES
卷 115, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.cemconcomp.2020.103826

关键词

MgO cement; Carbonation; CO2 concentration; Strength; Microstructure

资金

  1. Singapore-MIT Alliance for Research and Technology Innovation Centre [ING1510112-ENG]
  2. NYUAD Center for Interacting Urban Networks (CITIES) - Tamkeen under the NYUAD Research Institute Award [CG001]
  3. Swiss Re Institute under the Quantum Cities T initiative

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study found that the microstructural and mechanical properties of reactive MgO cement concrete are enhanced as the CO2 concentration increases. 5-20% CO2 led to a 5-fold increase in compressive strength, but samples cured under 20% CO2 showed limitations on further CO2 diffusion. The use of 5% CO2 produced comparable strengths at 28 days as 20% CO2, while samples cured under 10% CO2 exhibited the best performance.
This paper investigated the influence of different CO2 concentrations on the microstructural and mechanical development of reactive MgO cement (RMC) concrete. Combination of various analyses revealed the enhancement of hydrated magnesium carbonate (HMC) phases with relatively superior micro-mechanical properties as the CO2 concentration increased from ambient (similar to 0.04%) to accelerated (5-20%) levels. The higher CO2 diffusion within samples cured under 5-20% CO2 increased the compressive strength by similar to 5 times. While samples cured under 20% CO2 revealed high early strengths, the formation of a dense HMC layer on the sample exterior led to limitations on further CO2 diffusion. Use of 5% CO2 produced comparable strengths as 20% CO2 at 28 days, highlighting the potential of using lower concentrations. Samples cured under 10% CO2 revealed the best performance at 28 days, thereby defining this environment as the most favorable condition for the development of microstructural and mechanical properties of RMC concrete.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据