4.7 Article

Expression of PAWR predicts prognosis of ovarian cancer

期刊

CANCER CELL INTERNATIONAL
卷 20, 期 1, 页码 -

出版社

BMC
DOI: 10.1186/s12935-020-01704-y

关键词

Drug responsiveness; Ovarian cancer; PAWR; Survival

类别

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [81974405, 81572570]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background Ovarian cancer greatly threatens the general health of women worldwide. Implementation of predictive prognostic biomarkers aids in ovarian cancer management. Methods Using online databases, the general expression profile, target-disease associations, and interaction network of PAWR were explored. To identify the role of PAWR in ovarian cancer, gene correlation analysis, survival analysis, and combined analysis of drug responsiveness and PAWR expression were performed. The predictive prognostic value of PAWR was further validated in clinical samples. Results PAWR was widely expressed in normal and cancer tissues, with decreased expression in ovarian cancer tissues compared with normal tissues. PAWR was associated with various cancers including ovarian cancer. PAWR formed a regulatory network with a group of proteins and correlated with several genes, which were both implicated in ovarian cancer and drug responsiveness. High PAWR expression denoted better survival in ovarian cancer patients (OS: HR = 0.84, P = 0.0077; PFS, HR = 0.86, P = 0.049). Expression of PAWR could predict platinum responsiveness in ovarian cancer and there was a positive correlation between PAWR gene effect and paclitaxel sensitivity. In 12 paired clinical samples, the cancerous tissues exhibited significantly lower PAWR expression than matched normal fallopian tubes. The predictive prognostic value of PAWR was maintained in a cohort of 50 ovarian cancer patients. Conclusions High PAWR expression indicated better survival and higher drug responsiveness in ovarian cancer patients. PAWR could be exploited as a predictive prognostic biomarker in ovarian cancer.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据