4.6 Article

BTF3 promotes sternness and inhibits Typellnterferon signaling pathway in triple-negative breast cancer

期刊

出版社

ACADEMIC PRESS INC ELSEVIER SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1016/j.bbrc.2020.12.060

关键词

Triple-negative breast cancer; BTF3; Stemness; IRF7; Interferon signaling pathway

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [81972416, 81672554]
  2. Primary Research & Development Plan of Shandong Province [2019GSF108076]
  3. Natural Science Foundation of Shandong Province [ZR2018MH025]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The study demonstrates a relationship between BTF3 expression and stem-like properties in TNBC cells, modulating stemness, migration, and proliferation, and linking stem-like traits and the interferon signaling pathway in TNBC, playing a crucial role in the progression of TNBC cells.
Triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) is a major challenge in clinical practice due to its aggressiveness and lack of targeted treatment. Cancer stem-like traits contribute to tumorigenesis and immune privilege of TNBC. However, the relationship of stemness and immunosurveillance remains unclear. Here, we demonstrate that BTF3 expression is related with stem-like properties in TNBC cells. BTF3 modulates stemness, migration and proliferation of TNBC in vitro. Bioinformatics analysis revealed that interferon signaling pathways and IRF7, both of which participate in the immune escape of TNBC, are closely related to BTF3 in TNBC cells. Knockdown of BTF3 activates IRF7 expression through increased degradation of BMI1, a protein that can represses IRF7 transcription by directly binding to its promotor region. BTF3 links stem-like traits and the interferon signaling pathway, revealing the potential connection of stemness and immunomodulation in TNBC. Clinically, we suggest that BTF3 is predictive of poor prognosis in patients with TNBC. Together, our findings highlight an important role of BTF3 in regulating the progression of TNBC cells. (C) 2020 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据