4.0 Article

Youth mental health competencies in regional general practice

期刊

AUSTRALASIAN PSYCHIATRY
卷 29, 期 2, 页码 129-133

出版社

SAGE PUBLICATIONS LTD
DOI: 10.1177/1039856220970058

关键词

youth mental health; general practitioners; at-risk mental state; early intervention; pathways to care

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The study revealed that general practitioners have limited understanding and preparation to effectively address youth mental health issues, with barriers including high treatment costs, limited access to psychiatrists, and low patient engagement. The need for targeted training to equip GPs with the necessary skills and knowledge in this area is emphasized.
Objective: General practitioners (GPs) are key health professionals for referrals to mental health specialists. Youth mental health issues are particularly challenging, requiring a competent assessment and understanding of appropriate referral pathways. We surveyed local GPs about their understanding of youth mental health problems and needs to competently look after young patients. Methods: GPs working in the Hunter region were contacted via email, fax and post over a 6-month period in 2019. Results: Seventy-five GPs participated. They reported 577 of 1698 (34%) of young people seen 2 weeks prior to being surveyed presented with a mental health problem. Predominantly, referrals were to private practice psychologists and Headspace. Almost a third (31%) reported having limited understanding of 'at-risk mental state' and are 'not always comfortable' when facing a young person with a mental health problem. Nearly all (95%) expressed interest in attending specialised training. GPs identified treatment costs, scarce access to psychiatrists and limited patient engagement as the main obstacles to help young people. Conclusions: Effective treatment of a mental health problem relies on early identification. GPs are seeing young people on a regular basis but don't feel well equipped for this task and are keen to up-skill, which needs to be addressed by targeted training.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.0
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据