4.6 Article

Arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi help explain invasion success of Solidago canadensis

期刊

APPLIED SOIL ECOLOGY
卷 157, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.apsoil.2020.103763

关键词

Competitive tolerance and suppression; Conspecific and heterospecific soil; Plant invasion; Plant-soil feedback

资金

  1. Ministry of Science and Technology of the People's Republic of China [2017YFC1200102]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [31971552, 31700476]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study found that arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi (AMF) play a crucial role in driving the invasion of Solidago canadensis, with their positive feedback effect on the growth of S. canadensis being stronger than their negative feedback effect on native plants. Additionally, S. canadensis grew larger and had lower competitive suppression in conspecific soils, indicating the importance of different soil microbial guilds in plant invasions.
The importance of soil microbes as a whole has long been recognized in plant invasions, yet relatively few studies address the relative importance of different soil microbial guilds. To this end, we collected soils that were conditioned by plants in 18 pairs of invaded and uninvaded communities and conducted an assemblage experiment (invasive Solidago canadensis and five native plants) via four inoculations. Arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi (AMF) increased the growth of S. canadensis and its competitive suppression (the potential of S. canadensis to suppress its neighboring native plants). The positive feedback effect of AMF on S. canadensis was stronger than their negative feedback effect on five native plants. Solidago canadensis grew larger and had lower competitive suppression in conspecific soils than heterospecific soils. These findings suggest that AMF play a crucial role in driving S. canadensis invasions and also highlight that conspecific and heterospecific soils contribute to the success of S. canadensis through different pathways.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据