4.7 Article

Mono- and multimeric ferrocene congeners of quinoline-based polyamines as potential antiparasitics

期刊

DALTON TRANSACTIONS
卷 45, 期 34, 页码 13415-13426

出版社

ROYAL SOC CHEMISTRY
DOI: 10.1039/c6dt02685k

关键词

-

资金

  1. University of Cape Town (UCT)
  2. National Research Foundation (NRF) of South Africa [90500]
  3. Medical Research Council (MRC) of South Africa
  4. U. S. Department of Agriculture, Agricultural Research Service (National Program 108) [5325-42000-049-00D]
  5. Department of Biological Sciences
  6. University of the Pacific
  7. ARS [ARS-0430817, 912011] Funding Source: Federal RePORTER

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A series of mono- and multimeric polyamine-containing ferrocenyl complexes containing a quinoline motif were prepared. The complexes were characterised by standard techniques. The molecular structure of the monomeric salicylaldimine derivative was elucidated using single crystal X-ray diffraction and was consistent with the proposed structure. The antiplasmodial activity of the compounds were evaluated in vitro against both the NF54 (chloroquine-sensitive) and K1 (chloroquine-resistant) strains of Plasmodium falciparum. The polyamine derivatives exhibit good resistance index values suggesting that these systems are beneficial in overcoming the resistance experienced by chloroquine. Mechanistic studies suggest that haemozoin formation may be the target of these quinoline complexes in the parasite. Some of the complexes exhibit moderate to high cytotoxicity against WHCO1 oesophageal cancer cells in vitro. The monomeric ferrocenyl-amine complexes exhibit potent activity against this particular cell line. The complexes were also screened against the G3 strain of Trichomonas vaginalis and the salicylaldimine complexes demonstrated promising activity at the tested concentration. All of these compounds show no inhibitory effect on several common normal flora bacteria, indicative of their selectivity for eukaryotic pathogens and cancer.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据