4.7 Article

Application of advanced experimental techniques to elucidate the strengthening mechanisms operating in microalloyed ferritic steels with interphase precipitation

期刊

ACTA MATERIALIA
卷 201, 期 -, 页码 386-402

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.actamat.2020.10.014

关键词

Microalloyed steel; Interphase precipitation; Strengthening mechanisms; High resolution scanning transmission electron microscopy; Atom probe tomography

资金

  1. Australian Research Council (ARC) through the ARC Research Hub for Australian Steel Manufacturing under the Industrial Transformation Research Hubs scheme [IH130100017]
  2. Bluescope Steel Ltd. (Australia)
  3. ARC LIEF grant [LE120100104, LE0882613]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The microstructure and tensile properties of thermo-mechanically processed ferritic steels alloyed with Mo, Cr, V and Nb were investigated using scanning transmission electron microscopy, atom probe tomography and uniaxial tensile loading. The microstructures consisted of predominantly polygonal ferrite (similar to 4 +/- 3 mu m average grain size) and a high number density of nano-sized, disc-shaped interphase precipitates (similar to 2-4 nm diameter and 1 +/- 0.4 nm thick). Interphase fiber carbides were also present in V, Cr and Nb -alloyed steel. Cluster formation was observed both between the interphase precipitates in rows and in ferrite matrix between the rows. The individual contributions to yield strength arising from different operating strengthening mechanisms were estimated. For the first time, the operation of coherency and modulus strengthening mechanisms for nano-sized interphase precipitates in this class of steels was considered. The major contributions were due to grain boundary strengthening and nano-sized precipitation, in the order of similar to 280 MPa and similar to 395 MPa, respectively. Significant cluster strengthening (similar to 150-170 MPa) was also evident. (C) 2020 Acta Materialia Inc. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据