4.6 Review

The Role of Long Non-Coding RNAs in Intracranial Aneurysms and Subarachnoid Hemorrhage

期刊

LIFE-BASEL
卷 10, 期 9, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/life10090155

关键词

intracranial aneurysm; long non-coding RNAs; subarachnoid hemorrhage; pathogenesis; biomarker; therapy

资金

  1. Grant of the Republic of Bashkortostan [CD-43]
  2. National Natural Science Foundations of China [81971135, 81572482]
  3. China Postdoctoral Science Foundation [2019T120284, 2018M631964]
  4. Heilongjiang Postdoctoral Fund [LBH-TZ19]
  5. Russian Academic Excellence project 5-100 for the Sechenov University, Moscow, Russia
  6. GALLY International Research Institute, San Antonio, Texas, USA

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Intracranial aneurysms (IAs) represent the most complex and relevant problem of modern neurology and neurosurgery. They serve as one of the main causes of non-traumatic subarachnoid hemorrhage (SAH), causing up to 85% of all cases of intracranial hemorrhage, which is associated with frequent disability and high mortality among patients. Unfortunately, the molecular mechanisms of the development and rupture of IAs are still under study. Long non-coding RNAs (lncRNAs) are non-coding RNAs that typically have a length of more than 200 nucleotides. It is known that lncRNAs regulate many processes, such as transcription, translation, cell differentiation, regulation of gene expression, and regulation of the cell cycle. In recent years, a lot of evidence has established their role in human diseases from oncology to cardiovascular disease. Recent studies have shown that lncRNAs may be involved in the pathogenesis of IAs. The study of lncRNAs and its targets in various pathological conditions of a person is a rapidly developing field, and it is likely that the knowledge obtained from these studies regarding the pathogenesis of intracranial aneurysms will have the potential to use lncRNAs in therapy, as well as in the diagnosis and prediction of high aneurysms risk of rupture.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据