4.3 Article

Relationship of Sarcopenia with Microcirculation Measured by Skin Perfusion Pressure in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes

期刊

ENDOCRINOLOGY AND METABOLISM
卷 35, 期 3, 页码 578-586

出版社

KOREAN ENDOCRINE SOC
DOI: 10.3803/EnM.2020.679

关键词

Sarcopenia; Skin; Perfusion; Microcirculation; Diabetes mellitus; type 2

资金

  1. Soonchunhyang University

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background: Few studies have examined the relationship of sarcopenia with the microcirculation. The current study investigated the relationship of sarcopenia with microcirculatory function, as assessed by skin perfusion pressure (SPP), in type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) patients. Methods: In total, 102 T2DM patients who underwent SPP measurements and bioelectrical impedance analysis (BIA) were enrolled in this cross-sectional study. SPP was assessed using the laser Doppler technique. Sarcopenia was defined as low height-adjusted appendicular muscle mass (men, <7 kg/me; women. <5.7 kg/m(2)) using BIA. We divided the participants into two groups based on SPP (<= 50 and >50 mm Hg), and an SPP below 50 nun Hg was considered to reflect impaired microcirculation. Results: Fourteen patients (13.7%) were diagnosed with impaired microcirculatoiy function of the lower limb based on SPP. The prevalence of sarcopenia in all subjects was 11.8%, but the percentage of patients with an SPP <= 50 mm Hg who had sarcopenia was more than triple that of patients with an SPP > 50 mm Hg (28.6% vs. 9.1%, P=0.036). A significant positive correlation was found between SPP and appendicular muscle mass adjusted for height (P=0.041 for right-sided SPP). Multiple logistic regression analysis showed that patients with sarcopenia had an odds ratio of 4.1 (95% confidence interval, 1.01 to 24.9) for having an SPP <= 50 mm Hg even after adjustment for confounding factors. Conclusion: These results suggest that sarcopenia may be significantly associated with impaired microcirculation in patients with T2DM. Nonetheless, the small number of patients and wide CI require cautious interpretation of the results.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据