4.7 Article

Highly Efficient All-Polymer Solar Cells Enabled by Random Ternary Copolymer Acceptors with High Tolerance on Molar Ratios

期刊

SOLAR RRL
卷 4, 期 11, 页码 -

出版社

WILEY-V C H VERLAG GMBH
DOI: 10.1002/solr.202000409

关键词

all-polymer solar cells; device efficiencies; nonfullerene acceptors; polymer acceptors; random polymerizations

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China (NSFC) [21702154, 51773157]
  2. Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities
  3. Key Laboratory of Materials Processing and Mold
  4. Beijing National Laboratory for Molecular Sciences [BNLMS201905]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Finding effective molecular design strategies and fine tuning the molar ratios of donor/acceptor (D/A) random copolymers to optimize the blend microstructure of the photoactive layer is one of the main long-standing challenges in developing and fabricating highly efficient all-polymer solar cells (all-PSCs). Herein, a random ternary copolymerization strategy to develop four random copolymer acceptors PYEx(x = 10, 20, 30, 40) is used by polymerizing a fused-ring A-D-A-type acceptor unit modified from Y5 with a thiophene-connecting unit and a controlled amount of an ester-substituted thiophene (EST) unit. Compared with PYT (PYE0) of only Y5-like units and thiophene units, the ternary copolymers PYExshow slightly down-shifted lowest unoccupied molecular orbital (LUMO) energy levels, reduced absorption coefficients, and decreased electron mobilities. However, it is also demonstrated that this design approach rationally modifies the molecular aggregations of polymer acceptors, effectively fine tuning the blend morphology and physical mechanisms, and enhances the device performance of the PYEx-based all-PSCs. Among them, blends of PYE20 with donor polymer PBDB-T combine 13.6% power conversion efficiency (PCE). Of particular note is that all of the PYEx-based devices exhibit the best PCEs of over 13%, indicating the high tolerance on molar ratios.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据