4.6 Review

IFN-β3 differentially regulates the function of T cell subsets in MS and EAE

期刊

CYTOKINE & GROWTH FACTOR REVIEWS
卷 30, 期 -, 页码 47-54

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.cytogfr.2016.03.013

关键词

Multiple sclerosis; Interferon beta; T cell subsets; Inflammation; Experimental Autoimmune; Encephalomyelitis

资金

  1. General Secretariat of Research & Technology (GSRT) [MIS 450598]
  2. European Regional Development Fund of the European Union through Operational Program Competitiveness and Entrepreneurship of the National Strategic Reference Framework (NSRF)
  3. Transgenic Technology Unit (TTU) of Hellenic Pasteur Institute

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Multiple sclerosis (MS) is considered as a T cell mediated autoimmune disease of the CNS, although a pathogenic role has also been attributed to other immune cell types as well as to environmental and genetic factors. Considering that T cells are interesting from an immunopathogenic point of view and consequently from a therapeutic perspective, various T cell targeted therapies have been approved for MS. Interferon beta (IFN-beta) is widely used as first-line intervention for modulating T cell responses, although its pleiotropic and multifaceted activities influence its effectiveness on the disease development, with mechanisms that are not yet fully understood. Since different T cell populations, including pro-inflammatory and regulatory T cells, might affect the course of MS, the effects of IFN-beta become even more complex. This review will summarize recent findings regarding the T cell targeted effect of IFN-beta in MS and its animal model EAE, with emphasis on the direct actions of endogenous and exogenous IFN-beta on each T cell subpopulation involved in CNS autoimmunity. Delineating how IFN-beta exerts its action on different T cell types may eventually contribute to the designing of therapeutic strategies aiming to improve the effectiveness of this drug for MS treatment. (C) 2016 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据