4.7 Article

Start-up of anammox systems with different feeding patterns: System performance, microbial community and potential microbial interactions

期刊

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.jwpe.2020.101694

关键词

Anammox; Microbial interaction; Nutrient metabolism; Quorum sensing; Feeding pattern

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51738005]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The successful start-up of anaerobic ammonium oxidization (anammox) system is crucial for its application. Two different feeding patterns (pulse and constant) were studied, with pulse feeding showing quicker start-up and reaching steady state faster than constant feeding. Heterotrophs and other microorganisms play important roles in nitrogen and carbon metabolisms, while a quorum sensing system was also found in the anammox system. Complex microbial interactions such as competition, cooperation, and cross-feeding were observed and had an impact on system performance.
Successful start-up of the anaerobic ammonium oxidization (anammox) system is the main challenge for its application. Two anammox biofilm systems with pulse feeding pattern (AN-P) and constant feeding pattern (AN-C) were operated, and the performance of nitrogen removal and microbial interactions among anammox bacteria, heterotrophs, and other microorganisms were investigated. The total nitrogen removal percentage reached 82% (AN-P) and 82.4% (AN-C) in 13 days and 32 days, respectively. AN-P could start up and reach steady state quicker than AN-C. Candidatus Kuenenia was the dominant functional microorganism in both reactors. Heterotrophs (Pseudomonas and Hyphomicrobium) might play important roles in nitrogen and carbon metabolisms. N-decanoyl-DL-homoserine lactone and N-dodecanoyl-DL-homoserine lactone were detected, and acyl homoserine lactone-based quorum sensing system existed in the anammox system. Complex microbial interactions, including competition, cooperation and cross-feeding co-existed in the anammox system and affected system performance.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据