4.6 Review

Circular RNA Signature in Lung Adenocarcinoma: A MiOncoCirc Database-Based Study and Literature Review

期刊

FRONTIERS IN ONCOLOGY
卷 10, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

FRONTIERS MEDIA SA
DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2020.523342

关键词

circular RNAs; lung adenocarcinoma; biomarker; sponge; MiOncoCirc

类别

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [81772464]
  2. Tianjin Key Project of Natural Science Foundation [17JCZDJC36200]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Circular RNAs (circRNAs) are a class of endogenous non-coding RNAs (ncRNAs) with a structure of covalently closed continuous loops, which can regulate gene expression by acting as a microRNA sponge or through other mechanisms. Recent studies have identified that the expression of candidate circRNAs are dysregulated in various tumors and hence are considered as promising diagnostic or therapeutic targets across cancer types. However, the expression and function of circRNAs in lung adenocarcinoma (LUAD) remains unclear. In this article, we investigated the expression of circRNAs in LUAD via MiOncoCirc, which is the first and comprehensive database characterizing circRNAs across >2,000 cancer samples using an exome capture RNA sequencing. We identified seven abnormally expressed circRNAs in LUAD, including circCDR1-AS, circHIPK3, circFNDC3B, circPCMTD1, circRHOBTB3, circFAM13B, and circMAN1A2, as well as conducted a literature review about the function and features of these circRNAs. Previous studies have demonstrated that circCDR1-AS, circMAN1A2, and circHIPK3 were upregulated and significantly correlated with a poor survival, or promoted the tumor progression in lung cancer, whereas other circRNAs have not been fully explored. Besides, we reviewed all the publications regarding circRNAs and LUAD, and noticed that the dysregulation of these circRNAs impacts the development of LUAD through a variety of regulatory mechanisms. In conclusion, the underlying mechanisms of aberrant expression and functions of circRNAs in LUAD are worthy of being further investigated.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据