4.7 Article

The PINK1/PARK2/optineurin pathway of mitophagy is activated for protection in septic acute kidney injury

期刊

REDOX BIOLOGY
卷 38, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.redox.2020.101767

关键词

Acute kidney injury; Mitophgay; Optineurin; PINK1; PARK2; Sepsis

资金

  1. National Key R&D Program of China [2018YFC1312700]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [81720108008, 81870474]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The study demonstrated the induction of mitophagy in septic AKI models and revealed the role of the PINK1/PARK2 pathway. Mitophagy during sepsis plays a beneficial role in tubular cell survival and renal function.
Sepsis is the major cause of acute kidney injury (AKI) associated with high mortality rates. Mitochondrial dysfunction contributes to the pathophysiology of septic AKI. Mitophagy is an important mitochondrial quality control mechanism that selectively eliminates damaged mitochondria, but its role and regulation in septic AKI remain largely unknown. Here, we demonstrate the induction of mitophagy in mouse models of septic AKI induced by lipopolysaccharide (LPS) treatment or by cecal ligation and puncture. Mitophagy was also induced in cultured proximal tubular epithelial cells exposed to LPS. Induction of mitophagy under these experimental setting was suppressed by pink1 or park2 knockout, indicating the role of the PINK1/PARK2 pathway of mitophagy in septic AKI. In addition, sepsis induced more severe kidney injury and cell apoptosis in pink1 or park2 knockout mice than in wild-type mice, suggesting a beneficial role of mitophagy in septic AKI. Furthermore, in cultured renal tubular cells treated with LPS, knockdown of pink1 or park2 inhibited mitochondrial accumulation of the autophagy adaptor optineurin (OPTN) and silencing Optn inhibited LPS-induced mitophagy. Taken together, these findings suggest that the PINK1/PARK2 pathway of mitophagy plays an important role in mitochondrial quality control, tubular cell survival, and renal function in septic AKI.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据