4.6 Article

Machinability of SLM-produced Ti6Al4V titanium alloy parts

期刊

JOURNAL OF MANUFACTURING PROCESSES
卷 57, 期 -, 页码 768-786

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.jmapro.2020.07.035

关键词

Selective laser melting; Ti6Al4V; Stress relief; Microstructure; Cutting force; Tool wear

资金

  1. SENAI Institute of Innovation in Manufacturing Systems and Laser, Joinville, SC, Brazil

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Due to its vast benefits, Additive Manufacturing (AM) has attracted a great deal of attention during the last two decades. Selective Laser Melting (SLM) is one of the most increasingly used AM techniques in the world. The machinability of SLM-manufactured Ti6Al4V parts in as-built (SLM-AB) and stress-relief (SLM-SR) conditions was studied in this work via toroidal milling. A conventional processed Ti6Al4V alloy was tested as a reference. SLM process parameters for producing near fully dense parts were optimized to yield a volumetric energy density of 46.4 J/mm(3). Relative density, microstructure, hardness, residual stresses, surface roughness, cutting forces, tool wear, and chip morphology were evaluated. The SLM-manufactured parts gave a relative density of 99.70 % and higher hardness values than those of the conventional parts by a factor of about 1.2. The conventional, SLM-AB, and SLM-SR Ti6Al4V alloys exhibited microstructures consisting of alpha and beta phases, acicular alpha' martensite, alpha' martensite and some amounts of alpha + beta phases, respectively. The conventional alloy had the lowest residual stress. SLM-AB had considerable residual tensile stress in the 0 degrees direction of measurement, whereas SLM-SR had the highest compressive stress in both 0 degrees and 90 degrees directions. The lowest cutting force was observed in the conventional alloy and the highest in the SLM-SR alloy. The SLM-AB alloy featured the highest flank wear. However, no significant difference in flank wear was observed in the conventional and SLM-SR alloys.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据