4.6 Article

Wood Defect Detection Based on Depth Extreme Learning Machine

期刊

APPLIED SCIENCES-BASEL
卷 10, 期 21, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/app10217488

关键词

wood defect; CNN; ELM; genetic algorithm; detection

资金

  1. 2019 Jiangsu Province Key Research and Development Plan by the Jiangsu Province Science and Technology [BE2019112]
  2. Jiangsu Province International Science and Technology Cooperation Project [BZ2016028]
  3. 948 Import Program on the Internationally Advanced Forestry Science and Technology by the State Forestry Bureau [2014-4-48]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The deep learning feature extraction method and extreme learning machine (ELM) classification method are combined to establish a depth extreme learning machine model for wood image defect detection. The convolution neural network (CNN) algorithm alone tends to provide inaccurate defect locations, incomplete defect contour and boundary information, and inaccurate recognition of defect types. The nonsubsampled shearlet transform (NSST) is used here to preprocess the wood images, which reduces the complexity and computation of the image processing. CNN is then applied to manage the deep algorithm design of the wood images. The simple linear iterative clustering algorithm is used to improve the initial model; the obtained image features are used as ELM classification inputs. ELM has faster training speed and stronger generalization ability than other similar neural networks, but the random selection of input weights and thresholds degrades the classification accuracy. A genetic algorithm is used here to optimize the initial parameters of the ELM to stabilize the network classification performance. The depth extreme learning machine can extract high-level abstract information from the data, does not require iterative adjustment of the network weights, has high calculation efficiency, and allows CNN to effectively extract the wood defect contour. The distributed input data feature is automatically expressed in layer form by deep learning pre-training. The wood defect recognition accuracy reached 96.72% in a test time of only 187 ms.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据