4.5 Article

Robust Skyrmion Shift Device Through Engineering the Local Exchange-Bias Field

期刊

PHYSICAL REVIEW APPLIED
卷 14, 期 4, 页码 -

出版社

AMER PHYSICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevApplied.14.044008

关键词

-

资金

  1. Beijing Natural Science Foundation [Z190009]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China (NSFC) [11874409, 11804380]
  3. NSFC-Science Foundation Ireland (SFI) Partnership Programme [51861135104]
  4. K. C. Wong Education Foundation [GJTD-2019-14]
  5. Fujian Innovation Academy, Chinese Academy of Sciences [FJCXY18040302]
  6. Institute of Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences through the International Young Scientist Fellowship [2018001]
  7. Spins and Heat in Nanoscale Electronic Systems (SHINES) an Energy Frontier Research Center - U.S. Department of Energy, Office of Science, Basic Energy Sciences [DE-SC0012670]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Magnetic skyrmions are topologically protected spin structures, offering great promise as information carriers for future spintronic devices. However, a series of challenges, such as unreliable skyrmion motion, pinning effects, and a weak readout signal, prevent the development of skyrmionic applications. The recently demonstrated capability to engineer the local exchange-bias field (LEBF) in an exchange-biased composite, provides solutions to these challenges. By exploiting LEBF, we design and analyze a robust skyrmion shift device. LEBF-induced magnetic domain walls form the boundary of the device channel, and LEBF potential wells are implemented in the channel for positioning skyrmions. Based on simulations with comprehensive models, we demonstrate the proposed device has the advantages of (i) localizing the skyrmions in the absence of current, (ii) suppressing skyrmion annihilation during transport, (iii) promoting steady skyrmion motion, (iv) enhancing the skyrmion velocity, and (v) magnifying the readout signal. Our results form the basis for the design of robust skyrmion devices through LEBF engineering.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据