4.5 Article

Function of Interface Deposition of Calcium Sulfate in Pressure Acid Leaching of Black Shale-Hosted Vanadium

期刊

MINERALS
卷 10, 期 11, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/min10110952

关键词

black shale; vanadium extraction; surface deposition; pore propagation

资金

  1. National Key R&D Program of China [2018YFC1900500]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51804226, 51774215]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

During pressure acid leaching process of black shale-hosted vanadium, increasing the reaction interface of muscovite dissolution can enhance the vanadium release. In this paper, calcium sulfate (CaSO4) deposition behavior and its effect on muscovite under K2SO4 assistance were focused on for demonstrating the function of CaSO4 on vanadium leaching from the black shale. Results showed that as K2SO4 mediated, the apparent activation energy of vanadium leaching and the apparent reaction order of sulfuric acid decreased from 24.37 kJ/mol to 16.63 kJ/mol and 2.7 to 1.9, respectively. The leaching rate and dependence on pH value were modified. The vanadium leaching acceleration owed to CaSO4 deposition on muscovite in the black shale. The ion absorption stimulations found that Ca2+ is confirmed to be easily absorbed on the six-membered ring cavity of silicon-oxygen tetrahedrons in muscovite structure prior to K+ and Na+. Meanwhile, SO42- provides two oxygen atoms to bond with Ca2+ absorbed on muscovite (001) surface. The continuous absorption and bonding create CaSO4 deposition on muscovite (001) surface which also involves the load transmitting. The stress load transmitting correlates to pore formation in muscovite particles. It was proved that massive micropores initiated and proliferated in the existing pores under K2SO4 assistance. The porosity caused by CaSO4 deposition greatly increased the reaction interface of muscovite dissolution and accelerate internal diffusion of H+ to the reaction interface, which can significantly weaken the vanadium leaching dependence on acid.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据