4.2 Review

The potential of liquid biopsies

期刊

CURRENT OPINION IN ONCOLOGY
卷 28, 期 2, 页码 130-134

出版社

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1097/CCO.0000000000000267

关键词

circulating cell-free tumor DNA; circulating tumor cells; exosomes; resistance monitoring; therapy monitoring

类别

资金

  1. AstraZeneca
  2. Boehringer Ingelheim
  3. Merck Sharp Dohme
  4. Novartis
  5. Pfizer
  6. Roche

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Purpose of reviewThis article discusses the current status and applications of liquid biopsy in nonsmall cell lung cancer (NSCLC).Recent findingsThe discovery of genetic alterations which are responsible for the development and progression of NSCLC led to the identification of a new generation of molecular biomarkers. However, in NSCLC, it is often difficult in clinical practice to obtain sufficient tumor material for genetic analyses. Therefore, analyses of tumor-specific genetic alterations in the serum or plasma of the patients are particularly valuable because they can provide temporal measurements of the total tumor burden as well as identify specific mutations that arise during therapy. The procedure of taking blood samples to detect tumor-specific genetic alterations is termed liquid biopsy'. In particular, it can be used for a variety of clinical and research applications, including response assessment in epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR)-mutated NSCLC patients receiving EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitor therapy. It has been demonstrated that liquid biopsy is a fast and easy way to obtain information on tumor burden and assess the changes of the molecular nature of a tumor during the course of therapy. However, because of the limited amount of tumor material in the blood and yet insufficient knowledge of specific cancer biomarkers, extensive research has to be continued in this field to implement this method into clinical routine.SummaryIn this review, we highlight the opportunities and clinical as well as research applications of liquid biopsy in NSCLC patients.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据