4.2 Review

Update on the treatment of hypothyroidism

期刊

CURRENT OPINION IN ONCOLOGY
卷 28, 期 1, 页码 18-25

出版社

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1097/CCO.0000000000000242

关键词

athyreotic; deiodinases; hypothyroidism; levothyroxine replacement therapy; sustained release triiodothyronine; thyroid cancer

类别

资金

  1. National Institutes of Health [R01AG033867, UL1TR000101]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Purpose of review Differentiated thyroid cancer is a malignancy that is rapidly increasing in frequency. As thyroidectomy plays a central role in the treatment of thyroid cancer, it is incumbent on physicians treating this patient group to be well versed in the intricacies of treating hypothyroidism. Recent findings Treatment of hypothyroidism may be refined by careful attention to dose selection, monitoring of therapy and achievement of thyrotropin goals that are specific to the individual patient's overall clinical situation. These goals are common not only to patients with a sole diagnosis of hypothyroidism, as discussed in the recent American Thyroid Association Guidelines, but also to patients with hypothyroidism in the setting of thyroid cancer. Several recent studies have illuminated our understanding of the benefits and risks of thyrotropin suppression therapy in patients with differentiated thyroid cancer. Multiple studies of combination therapy with levothyroxine and liothyronine for treating hypothyroidism have not led to a clear conclusion about its benefits over levothyroxine monotherapy. Animal studies have advanced our understanding of the altered serum and tissue milieu that characterizes levothyroxine monotherapy. Crossing the bridge from this translational research into clinical research using sustained release triiodothyronine preparations may ultimately enhance the health of our patients. Summary Continued refinement of our understanding of thyroid status and our ability to flawlessly implement thyroid hormone replacement is an active area of research.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据