4.6 Article

Agro-Waste Derived Biomass Impregnated with TiO2 as a Potential Adsorbent for Removal of As(III) from Water

期刊

CATALYSTS
卷 10, 期 10, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/catal10101125

关键词

adsorption; TiO2; As(III); photocatalytic oxidation; adsorption capacity; isotherm model

资金

  1. Traditional Culture Convergence Research Program through the National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) - Ministry of Science, CT & Future Planning [2018M3C1B5052283]
  2. National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) - Korea Government (MSIT) [NRF-2019R1A2C1004467]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A novel type of adsorbent, TiO2 impregnated pomegranate peels (PP@TiO2) was successfully synthesized and its efficacy was investigated based on the removal of As(III) from water. The adsorbent was characterized using Scanning Electron Microscopy (SEM), Energy Dispersive X-ray Spectrometer (EDS), X-ray Diffraction (XRD) analysis, and Fourier Transform Infrared (FTIR) Spectroscopy, to evaluate its morphology, elemental analysis, crystallinity, and functional groups, respectively. Batch experiments were conducted on PP@TiO2 for As(III) adsorption to assess the adsorption isotherm, effect of pH, and adsorption kinetics. Characterization data suggested that TiO2 was successfully impregnated on the biomass substrate. The equilibrium data better fitted to the Langmuir isotherm model having a maximum adsorption capacity of 76.92 mg/g and better distribution coefficients (K-D) in the order of similar to 10(3) mL/g. The highest percentage of adsorption was found at neutral pH. The adsorption kinetics followed the pseudo-2nd-order model. X-ray Photoelectron Spectroscopy (XPS) of the adsorption product exhibited that arsenic was present as As(III) and partially oxidized to As(V). PP@TiO2 can work effectively in the presence of coexisting anions and could be regenerated and reused. Overall, these findings suggested that the as-prepared PP@TiO2 could provide a better and efficient alternative for the synergistic removal of As(III) from water.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据