4.6 Article

A Transportation Network Paradox: Consideration of Travel Time and Health Damage due to Pollution

期刊

SUSTAINABILITY
卷 12, 期 19, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/su12198107

关键词

paradox; health damage; the value of time; user equilibrium; system optimization

资金

  1. Zhejiang Natural Science Foundation [LY18G020008]
  2. Major Project of Center for Research in Regional Economic Opening and Development of Zhejiang [16JDGH011]
  3. Postdoctoral fund in China [2017M621489]
  4. Zhejiang Province Soft Science Foundation of China [2019C35006]
  5. General projects of Humanities and social sciences of the Ministry of Education [20YJCZH005]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In cities with serious air pollution, travel time and health damage significantly affect route choice by travelers (e.g., motorcycle and scooter drivers). Consequently, the classical Braess paradox is no longer realistic because it only considers the traveler's value of time (VOT). In the current study, we describe a new transportation network paradox that considers both the VOT and the traveler's perception of pollution damage. To examine the conditions that create the new paradox, we developed a novel method to compute a total comprehensive cost that combines the VOT with health damage. We analyzed the conditions for the new paradox and the system's performance using a user equilibrium model and system optimization. Furthermore, an improved model is used to analyze how different transport modes influence the Braess paradox. We found that whether the new paradox occurs and the potential improvement of the system's performance depend on whether the total travel demand falls within critical ranges. The bounds of these ranges depend on the values of the parameters in the function that describes the health damage and the link travel time function. In addition, high health damage significantly affects route choices and traffic flow distribution. This paper presents a new perspective for decision-making by transportation planners and for route choices in cities with serious air pollution.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据