4.4 Article

Use of simulation in the industry 4.0 context: Creation of a Digital Twin to optimise decision making on non-automated process

期刊

JOURNAL OF SIMULATION
卷 16, 期 3, 页码 284-297

出版社

TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.1080/17477778.2020.1811172

关键词

Industry 4; 0; Discrete Event Simulation; Digital Twin; optimised decision making

资金

  1. Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Cientifico e Tecnologico
  2. Coordenacao de Aperfeicoamento de Pessoal de Nivel Superior

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The advent of new technologies has had a significant impact on systems management, with Industry 4.0 seeking increasingly automated, integrated, and digitized processes. This paper analyzes the applicability of Discrete Event Simulation as a Digital Twin in a non-automated process, proposing a method for conducting simulation projects of this nature and verifying its effectiveness in a real study object. The paper also discusses some issues related to the use of simulation as Digital Twins.
The advent of new technologies brings a significant impact on systems management. The Industry 4.0 looks for increasingly automated, integrated, and digitised processes. We highlight the use of simulation as a Digital Twin, a virtual and intelligent copy capable of mirroring real processes and optimise decision making. This paper analyses the applicability of the Discrete Event Simulation as a Digital Twin in a non-automated process, a challenging scenario on the implementation of Industry 4.0 solutions. Amethod for conducting simulation projects of this nature was proposed, considering its integration with the process data, as well as its constant updating due to changes in the real environment. To verify its applicability, the method was used in a real study object. The proposed approach proved possible from the present research. We also present some discussions related to the use of simulation as Digital Twins, highlighting the main characteristics of such an application.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据