4.3 Review

Glucagon-like peptide-1, glucagon-like peptide-2, and lipid metabolism

期刊

CURRENT OPINION IN LIPIDOLOGY
卷 27, 期 3, 页码 257-263

出版社

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1097/MOL.0000000000000293

关键词

glucagon-like peptide-1; glucagon-like peptide-2; incretin; lipoprotein

资金

  1. Swiss National Science Foundation
  2. Swiss National Science Foundation Ambizione Grant
  3. European Union
  4. Zurich Center of Integrative Human Physiology
  5. Swiss Cardio-Onco-Grant - Alfred and Annemarie von Sick Grant

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Purpose of review Glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) is the best known incretin hormone able to potentiate glucose-induced insulin secretion. Moreover, GLP-1 is currently under intensive investigation as a potential crucial mediator of beneficial metabolic effects after bariatric surgery, because of its eating inhibitory, antiobesity, and antidiabetes effects. This review briefly summarizes recent findings on the specific effects of GLP-1 on lipoprotein metabolism. The related hormone GLP-2 is derived from the same precursor gene; its effects on lipoprotein metabolism will also be discussed briefly. Recent findings Pharmacological activation of the GLP-1 system has beneficial effects on obesity-induced alterations of lipoprotein metabolism. These benefits can be observed with direct GLP-1 receptor agonists like liraglutide or exendin-4, but also with inhibitors of dipeptidyl peptidase IV (DPP-IV), which reduce the breakdown of endogenous GLP-1. The role of GLP-2-related pathways on lipid levels and metabolism are less clear, but some effects (e. g. increased intestinal chylomicron output) are opposite to GLP-1. Summary Activation of the GLP-1-dependent pathways may perhaps translate into a lower cardiovascular risk. Understanding how GLP-1 and GLP-2 regulate and interact in the control of lipoprotein metabolism will set the stage for the development of new strategies to treat dyslipidaemia in obesity, diabetes, and other cardiometabolic diseases.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据