4.6 Article

Hyper-Graph Regularized Constrained NMF for Selecting Differentially Expressed Genes and Tumor Classification

期刊

出版社

IEEE-INST ELECTRICAL ELECTRONICS ENGINEERS INC
DOI: 10.1109/JBHI.2020.2975199

关键词

Matrix decomposition; Manifolds; Informatics; Bioinformatics; Cancer; Information science; Tumors; Non-negative matrix factorization; Hyper-graph; Label information; Tumor classification; Differentially expressed genes; TCGA datasets

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [61872220, 61572284, 61872219]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Non-negative Matrix Factorization (NMF) is a dimensionality reduction approach for learning a parts-based and linear representation of non-negative data. It has attracted more attention because of that. In practice, NMF not only neglects the manifold structure of data samples, but also overlooks the priori label information of different classes. In this paper, a novel matrix decomposition method called Hyper-graph regularized Constrained Non-negative Matrix Factorization (HCNMF) is proposed for selecting differentially expressed genes and tumor sample classification. The advantage of hyper-graph learning is to capture local spatial information in high dimensional data. This method incorporates a hyper-graph regularization constraint to consider the higher order data sample relationships. The application of hyper-graph theory can effectively find pathogenic genes in cancer datasets. Besides, the label information is further incorporated in the objective function to improve the discriminative ability of the decomposition matrix. Supervised learning with label information greatly improves the classification effect. We also provide the iterative update rules and convergence proofs for the optimization problems of HCNMF. Experiments under The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) datasets confirm the superiority of HCNMF algorithm compared with other representative algorithms through a set of evaluations.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据