4.7 Review

Polysaccharide-Based In Situ Self-Healing Hydrogels for Tissue Engineering Applications

期刊

POLYMERS
卷 12, 期 10, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/polym12102261

关键词

polysaccharide; self-healing; in situ hydrogels; dynamic bonds; injectability; tissue engineering

资金

  1. Spanish State Research Agency (AEI)
  2. European Regional Development Fund (ERFD) [PID2019-106099RB-C43/AEI/10.13039/501100011033]
  3. Spanish Ministry of Economy and Competitiveness (MINECO) [MAT2016-76039-C4-3-R]
  4. Basque Government Industry and Education Department under the ELKARTEK program [KK-2020/00068, KK-2020/00099, KK2019/00039, KK2019/00101]
  5. Basque Government Industry and Education Department under the HAZITEK program [PIBA-2018-06]
  6. Basque Government Industry and Education Department under the PIBA program [PIBA-2018-06]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In situ hydrogels have attracted increasing interest in recent years due to the need to develop effective and practical implantable platforms. Traditional hydrogels require surgical interventions to be implanted and are far from providing personalized medicine applications. However, in situ hydrogels offer a wide variety of advantages, such as a non-invasive nature due to their localized action or the ability to perfectly adapt to the place to be replaced regardless the size, shape or irregularities. In recent years, research has particularly focused on in situ hydrogels based on natural polysaccharides due to their promising properties such as biocompatibility, biodegradability and their ability to self-repair. This last property inspired in nature gives them the possibility of maintaining their integrity even after damage, owing to specific physical interactions or dynamic covalent bonds that provide reversible linkages. In this review, the different self-healing mechanisms, as well as the latest research on in situ self-healing hydrogels, is presented, together with the potential applications of these materials in tissue regeneration.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据