4.7 Article

Genome Modularization Reveals Overlapped Gene Topology Is Necessary for Efficient Viral Reproduction

期刊

ACS SYNTHETIC BIOLOGY
卷 9, 期 11, 页码 3079-3090

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acssynbio.0c00323

关键词

bacteriophage; genome engineering proteomics; synthetic biology; virus structure; refactoring

资金

  1. Macquarie Research Excellence Ph.D. Scholarship
  2. Molecular Sciences Department of Macquarie University
  3. Faculty of Science & Engineering of Macquarie University
  4. Macquarie University
  5. NSW government
  6. Electron Microscope Unit at UNSW, Sydney

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Sequence overlap between two genes is common across all genomes, with viruses having high proportions of these gene overlaps. Genome modularization and refactoring is the process of disrupting natural gene overlaps to separate coding sequences to enable their individual manipulation. The biological function and fitness effects of gene overlaps are not fully understood, and their effects on gene cluster and genome-level refactoring are unknown. The bacteriophage phi X174 genome has similar to 26% of nudeotides involved in encoding more than one gene. In this study we use an engineered phi X174 phage containing a genome with all gene overlaps removed to show that gene overlap is critical to maintaining optimal viral fecundity. Through detailed phenotypic measurements we reveal that genome modularization in phi X174 causes virion replication, stability, and attachment deficiencies. Quantitation of the complete phage proteome across an infection cycle reveals 30% of proteins display abnormal expression patterns. Taken together, we have for the first time comprehensively demonstrated that gene modularization severely perturbs the coordinated functioning of a bacteriophage replication cycle. This work highlights the biological importance of gene overlap in natural genomes and that reducing gene overlap disruption should be an integral part of future genome engineering projects.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据