4.3 Article

Modulating NK cell metabolism for cancer immunotherapy

期刊

SEMINARS IN HEMATOLOGY
卷 57, 期 4, 页码 213-224

出版社

W B SAUNDERS CO-ELSEVIER INC
DOI: 10.1053/j.seminhematol.2020.10.003

关键词

NK cells; NK cell-based cancer immunotherapy; metabolism; glycolysis; OXPHOS; lipid metabolism; CAR

资金

  1. AECC-Spanish Association Against Cancer [PROYE16074BORR]
  2. Health Department, Basque Government [2020333024]
  3. Jesus de Gan-goiti Barrera Foundation [FJGB18/002]
  4. Department of Education, Basque Government [PRE_2019_2_0109]
  5. Jesus de Gangoiti Barrera Foundation [FJGB19/002]
  6. BBK Fundazioa [1543/2006_0 001]
  7. Instituto de Salud Carlos III-Contratos Sara Borrell [CD17/00128]
  8. European Social Fund (ESF)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Natural killer (NK) cells are lymphocytes with potent antitumor functions and, therefore, multiple NK cell-based cancer immunotherapies have been developed and are currently being tested. However, there a necessity to find new means to improve these therapies, and immunometabolism represents an attractive target. NK cell effector functions are intricately linked to their metabolism, and modulating the latter could be the key to release their full potential. In this review, we have summarized how NK cell metabolism is regulated during some processes, such as maturation, viral infection, and cytokine stimulation. Additionally, we provide an overview of how NK cell metabolism is affected by current therapeutic approaches aimed to promote NK cell expansion and/or to increase their effector functions. We have also recapitulated several strategies that could help alleviating the metabolic impairment that characterizes tumor-infiltrating NK cells, and thus increase or restore their effector functions. Furthermore, we have reviewed several therapeutic approaches targeting cancer metabolism that could synergize with NK cell based cancer immunotherapies, and thus enhance their efficacy. (C) 2020 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Inc.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据